Digital Forensic Analysis of UAV Flight Data Using Static and Dynamic Methods in Coal Mining Area

  • Muhammad Yusuf Halim Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Luthfi Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
Keywords: UAV Forensics, DJI Mini 3, Static and Dynamic Acquisition, EXIF Metadata, Flight Path Analysis

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have become vital tools in industrial sectors such as coal mining for site inspections and operational monitoring. However, unauthorized UAV flights present security risks that necessitate forensic investigation. This study examines a forensic case involving a DJI Mini 3 UAV suspected of crossing company boundaries. Using the Conceptual Digital Forensics Model for the Drone Forensic Field, both static and dynamic forensic acquisition methods were applied. Static acquisition recovered 53 photographs, 11 videos, 11 audio files, 10 deleted photos, 4 deleted videos, and 3 unidentified log files. Dynamic acquisition yielded 64 media files including 63 photographs (.JPG and .jpg) with 10 deleted, 14 videos (.MP4, .MOV, .SWF) with 6 deleted, 11 audio files, 4 plain text files, 31 deleted files, 3 EXIF metadata records containing GPS coordinates, and 3 unidentified log files. The GPS data from EXIF metadata was visualized in Google Earth to map flight paths and confirm boundary violations. These findings demonstrate that dynamic acquisition retrieves a more comprehensive artifact set than static acquisition. This study highlights the importance of UAV digital forensics in supporting security investigations and ensuring compliance with industrial UAV policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Al-Room et al., ‘Drone Forensics: A Case Study of Digital Forensic Investigations Conducted on Common Drone Models’, International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–25, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJDCF.2021010101.

N. Y. Pinatik and F. S. Papilaya, ‘Pengolahan Foto Udara UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) Menggunakan Software Agisoft Metashape’, jupel, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.32520/jupel.v6i1.2838.

A. Al-Dhaqm, R. A. Ikuesan, V. R. Kebande, S. Razak, and F. M. Ghabban, ‘Research Challenges and Opportunities in Drone Forensics Models’, Electronics, vol. 10, no. 13, p. 1519, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics10131519.

R. Kumar and A. K. Agrawal, ‘Drone GPS data analysis for flight path reconstruction: A study on DJI, Parrot & Yuneec make drones’, Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 38, p. 301182, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301182.

S. Silalahi, T. Ahmad, and H. Studiawan, ‘Transformer-Based Named Entity Recognition on Drone Flight Logs to Support Forensic Investigation’, IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 3257–3274, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3234605.

M. Loli, S. A. Mitoulis, A. Tsatsis, J. Manousakis, R. Kourkoulis, and D. Zekkos, ‘Flood Characterization Based on Forensic Analysis of Bridge Collapse Using UAV Reconnaissance and CFD Simulations’, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 822, p. 153661, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153661.

I. P. Putrawiyanta, Novalisae, Noveriady, Ferdinandus, and A. Drobank, ‘Pemanfaatan Teknologi Drone Untuk Pemetaan Perubahan Rona Bentang Alam Pada Wilayah Pertambangan’, AKSELERASI, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 50–56, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.54783/jin.v5i3.783.

V. Chamola, P. Kotesh, A. Agarwal, Naren, N. Gupta, and M. Guizani, ‘A Comprehensive Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Attacks and Neutralization Techniques’, Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 111, p. 102324, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102324.

A. Almusayli, T. Zia, and E.-H. Qazi, ‘Drone Forensics: An Innovative Approach to the Forensic Investigation of Drone Accidents Based on Digital Twin Technology’, Technologies, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 11, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/technologies12010011.

F. Alotaibi, A. Al-Dhaqm, and Y. D. Al-Otaibi, ‘A Conceptual Digital Forensic Investigation Model Applicable to the Drone Forensics Field’, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 11608–11615, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.48084/etasr.6195.

S. E. Prastya, S. P. Cipta, and B. Nugraha, ‘Analisis Log Penerbangan Pada Unmaned Aerial Vechile (UAV) Sebagai Barang Bukti Digital’, JTekInfULM, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–18, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.20527/jtiulm.v5i1.42.

M. Stanković, M. M. Mirza, and U. Karabiyik, ‘UAV Forensics: DJI Mini 2 Case Study’, Drones, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 49, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/drones5020049.

E. Mantas and C. Patsakis, ‘Who watches the new watchmen? The challenges for drone digital forensics investigations’, Array, vol. 14, p. 100135, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.array.2022.100135.

A. Taylor, ‘A Digital Forensics Case Study of the DJI Mini 3 Pro and DJI RC’, arXiv, p. 20, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.10487.

DJI, ‘DJI Mini 3’, DJI Mini 3 So Fly, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.dji.com/id/mini-3

P. K C, R. Soman, and P. Honnavalli, ‘Validity of Forensic Evidence using Hash Function’, in 2020 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), Coimbatore, India: IEEE, Jun. 2020, pp. 823–826. doi: 10.1109/ICCES48766.2020.9138061.

P. Kr. Boyanov, ‘Practical Applications of Hash Functions MD5, SHA-1, And SHA-256 Using Various Software Tools to Verify the Integrity of Files’, JSAR, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 120–137, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.46687/jsar.v27i1.413.

R. Indonesia ‘Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik’. 2024.

R. Indonesia, ‘Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 63 Tahun 2021 tentang Peraturan Keselamatan Penerbangan Sipil Bagian 107 tentang Sistem Pesawat Udara Kecil Tanpa Awak’. 2021.

Published
2025-06-23
Abstract views: 155 times
Download PDF: 49 times
How to Cite
Halim, M., & Luthfi, A. (2025). Digital Forensic Analysis of UAV Flight Data Using Static and Dynamic Methods in Coal Mining Area. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 7(2), 1042-1060. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v7i2.1061
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)