Governing Agentic AI in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review of Ethical Challenges, Framework Gaps, and Ubuntu-Informed Governance Solutions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1738

Keywords:

agentic AI, AI governance, Africa, Ubuntu ethics, systematic literature review

Abstract

Agentic AI systems pursue goals through multi-step planning, tool use, memory, and adaptive action, creating governance challenges that differ from those associated with conventional predictive or generative AI. This study systematically reviews governance evidence relevant to agentic AI in Africa and develops an Ubuntu-informed conceptual framework. Following PRISMA 2020, 91 records published from 2019 to April 2026 were analysed through quantitative content analysis and abductive thematic synthesis. The corpus comprises 12 agentic-AI-specific records, 3 agentic-adjacent records, and 76 broader AI-governance records used as contextual evidence. Five literature-derived gaps were identified: accountability across autonomous action chains, infrastructure-aware oversight, bias and representational harm, policy fragmentation, and community exclusion. These findings inform five proposed governance elements: communal impact assessment, collective consent and participation, infrastructure-contingent oversight, African dataset and bias auditing, and communal accountability. The framework is a literature-derived conceptual proposition, not an empirically validated governance instrument, and requires future case-study, expert-panel, and comparative policy testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] F. Holldack, L. Banh, and G. Strobel, "Agentic information systems," Electron. Mark., vol. 36, art. no. 5, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s12525-025-00861-0.

[2] I. Adabara et al., "A review of agentic AI in cybersecurity: Cognitive autonomy, ethical governance, and quantum-resilient defense," F1000Research, vol. 14, art. no. 843, 2025, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.169337.1.

[3] M. Abou Ali, F. Dornaika, and J. Charafeddine, "Agentic AI: A comprehensive survey of architectures, applications, and future directions," Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 59, art. no. 11, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10462-025-11422-4.

[4] South Africa Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, "Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Policy," General Notice 3880, Government Gazette No. 54477, Apr. 10, 2026.

[5] South Africa Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, "Withdrawal of the Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Policy," General Notice 3978, Government Gazette No. 54840, Jun. 12, 2026.

[6] South Africa Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, "Budget vote speech – Minister Solly Malatsi," May 12, 2026.

[7] European Parliament and Council of the European Union, "Regulation 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence," Off. J. Eur. Union, 2024.

[8] OECD, "Recommendation of the Council on artificial intelligence," OECD Publishing, 2019, doi: 10.1787/eedfee77-en.

[9] UNESCO, "Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence," United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2021.

[10] A. Baird and L. M. Maruping, "The next generation of research on IS use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS artifacts," MIS Q., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 315–341, 2021, doi: 10.25300/misq/2021/15882.

[11] P. A. Olujimi, P. A. Owolawi, R. C. Mogase, and E. Van Wyk, "Agentic AI frameworks in SMMEs: A systematic literature review of ecosystemic interconnected agents," AI, vol. 6, no. 6, art. no. 123, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ai6060123.

[12] A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, "The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines," Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389–399, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

[13] J. Whittlestone, R. Nyrup, A. Alexandrova, and S. Cave, "The role and limits of principles in AI ethics: Towards a focus on tensions," in Proc. 2019 AAAI/ACM Conf. AI, Ethics, and Society, 2019, pp. 195–200, doi: 10.1145/3306618.3314289.

[14] A. Birhane, "Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach," Patterns, vol. 2, no. 2, art. no. 100205, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.

[15] P. Plantinga, K. Shilongo, O. Mudongo, A. Umubyeyi, M. Gastrow, and G. Razzano, "Responsible artificial intelligence in Africa: Towards policy learning," Data Policy, vol. 6, art. no. e72, 2024, doi: 10.1017/dap.2024.60.

[16] H. Coovadia, B. Marx, I. Botha, and N. O. Gold, "Building an ethical artificial intelligence corporate governance framework for the integration of emerging technologies into business processes," S. Afr. J. Account. Res., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 286–316, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10291954.2025.2523661.

[17] G. A. Ooko, "Toward a decolonial framework for communicating AI in African public service," Emerg. Media, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 462–473, 2025, doi: 10.1177/27523543251374174.

[18] N. Pasipamire and A. Muroyiwa, "Navigating algorithm bias in AI: Ensuring fairness and trust in Africa," Front. Res. Metr. Anal., vol. 9, art. no. 1486600, 2024, doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1486600.

[19] South Africa Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, "South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Policy Framework," 2024.

[20] African Union, "Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy," African Union Commission, 2024.

[21] K. Yilma, "Ethics of AI in Africa: Interrogating the role of Ubuntu and AI governance initiatives," Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 27, art. no. 24, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10676-025-09834-5.

[22] A. Gwagwa, E. Kazim, and A. Hilliard, "The role of the African value of Ubuntu in global AI inclusion discourse: A normative ethics perspective," Patterns, vol. 3, no. 4, art. no. 100462, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100462.

[23] T. Metz, "Toward an African moral theory," J. Polit. Philos., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 321–341, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00280.x.

[24] T. Metz, "Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa," Afr. Hum. Rights Law J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 532–559, 2011, doi: 10.17159/1996-2096/2011/v11n2a5.

[25] C. Okoli, "A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review," Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 37, art. no. 43, 2015, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.03743.

[26] D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, "Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review," Br. J. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 207–222, 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.

[27] J. Thomas and A. Harden, "Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews," BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 8, no. 1, art. no. 45, 2008, doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.

[28] M. J. Page et al., "PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews," BMJ, vol. 372, art. no. n160, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.

[29] M. J. Page et al., "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," BMJ, vol. 372, art. no. n71, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

[30] Q. N. Hong et al., "The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018 for information professionals and researchers," Educ. Inf., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 285–291, 2018, doi: 10.3233/EFI-180221.

[31] N. Diakopoulos, "Accountability in algorithmic decision making," Commun. ACM, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 56–62, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2844110.

[32] M. Janssen et al., "Will algorithmic governance precipitate the end of democracy?," Commun. ACM, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 36–38, 2022.

[33] J. A. Kroll, J. Huey, S. Barocas, E. W. Felten, J. R. Reidenberg, D. G. Robinson, and H. Yu, "Accountable algorithms," Univ. Pa. Law Rev., vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 633–705, 2017.

[34] Republic of South Africa, "Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013," Government Gazette, vol. 581, art. no. 37067, 2013.

[35] G. A. Myovella, M. Karaçuka, and J. Haucap, "Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in Sub-Saharan African economies: A spatial Durbin analysis," Telecommun. Policy, vol. 45, no. 10, art. no. 102224, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102224.

[36] J. Cariolle, "International connectivity and the digital divide in Sub-Saharan Africa," Inf. Econ. Policy, vol. 55, art. no. 100901, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100901.

[37] W. Munyoka and M. S. Maharaj, "Privacy, security, trust, risk and optimism bias in e-government use: The case of two Southern African Development Community countries," S. Afr. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.4102/sajim.v21i1.983.

[38] J. Osah and C. Pade-Khene, "E-government strategy formulation in resource-constrained local government in South Africa," J. Inf. Technol. Politics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 426–451, 2020, doi: 10.1080/19331681.2020.1715907.

[39] N. Couldry and U. A. Mejias, "Data colonialism: Rethinking big data's relation to the contemporary subject," Telev. New Media, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 336–349, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1527476418796632.

[40] S. Mohamed, M. T. Png, and W. Isaac, "Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence," Philos. Technol., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 659–684, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8.

[41] Z. Obermeyer, B. Powers, C. Vogeli, and S. Mullainathan, "Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations," Science, vol. 366, no. 6464, pp. 447–453, 2019, doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.

[42] Ghana Ministry of Communication, Digital Technology and Innovations, "National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025–2035," Government of Ghana, Apr. 24, 2026.

[43] Ministry of Information, Communications and the Digital Economy, Kenya, "Kenya Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025–2030," Government of Kenya, 2025.

[44] National Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, National Information Technology Development Agency, "National Artificial Intelligence Strategy," Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2025.

[45] I. Rahwan, "Society-in-the-loop: Programming the algorithmic social contract," Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10676-017-9430-8.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 5 (2026): October

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author's Declaration

  1. The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
  2. The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
  3. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
  4. The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
  5. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
  6. The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
  7. If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
  8. The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights

How to Cite

[1]
T. S. Adeyelure, “Governing Agentic AI in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review of Ethical Challenges, Framework Gaps, and Ubuntu-Informed Governance Solutions”, journalisi, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 6347–6375, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1738.