AI-Assisted Development Tools and Team Dynamics in South African Software Engineering Teams

Authors

  • Bassey Isong North-West University, South Africa
  • Tshipuke Vhahangwele North-West University, South Africa
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i3.1615

Keywords:

AI-assisted development tools, GitHub Copilot, software team dynamics, software delivery outcomes, South African software development

Abstract

AI-assisted development tools are widely adopted in software engineering (SE), yet their effects on team dynamics and software delivery outcomes remain poorly understood in sub-Saharan African settings. This paper investigates how AI tool integration influences team roles, collaboration, skill requirements, and software delivery outcomes among South African software development professionals. A mixed-methods design was used, combining a structured survey with thematic analysis of open-ended responses from 40 participants across developer, tester, DevOps, and team lead roles. Multiple linear regression and Spearman's rank correlation were applied to quantitative data; thematic analysis followed the six-phase approach of Braun and Clarke. Findings show that GitHub Copilot was used by 75% of respondents. Interpersonal trust was the strongest predictor of development speed (β = 0.485, p = 0.017), exceeding all AI-specific variables in the model. AI use at the adoption onset reduced development speed; frequency of use increased it. Role transformation was reported by 95% of respondents and predicted team productivity. However, causal inference is not warranted given the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported measures. The findings are further constrained by a purposive sample of 40 drawn from networked professional communities, which limits statistical power and generalisability. To the authors’ knowledge, no prior published study has examined AI adoption and team dynamics within a South African SE population, using this combination of methods, though a systematic literature review of that literature was beyond the scope of this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] N. Gupta, “The Rise of AI Copilots: Redefining Human-Machine Collaboration in Knowledge Work,” Int. J. Humanities Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, 2025. https://doi.org/10.21590/

[2] S. Panyam and P. Gujar, “How AI Agents Are Transforming Software Engineering and the Future of Product Development,” Computer, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 71–77, May 2025, doi: 10.1109/MC.2024.3488378.

[3] B. Tabarsi et al., “LLMs' Reshaping of People, Processes, Products, and Society in Software Development: A Comprehensive Exploration with Early Adopters,” arXiv, preprint. arXiv:2503.05012, 2025.

[4] S. Sarkar, “The Effect of AI Tools on Modern Software Development for Frontend Engineering: An Empirical Analysis,” SSRN Electronic Journal, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5442494.

[5] R. Mo et al., “Assessing and Analyzing the Correctness of GitHub Copilot’s Code Suggestions,” ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 34, no. 7, Art. no. 194, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1145/3715108.

[6] C. Johnson et al., “The AI Productivity Paradox in Software Development: A Meta-Analysis of Implementation Outcomes and ROI Patterns (2024-2025),” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2025, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5902163.

[7] Z. S. Li, N. N. Arony, A. M. Awon, D. Damian, and B. Xu, “AI Tool Use and Adoption in Software Development by Individuals and Organizations: A Grounded Theory Study,” arXiv, preprint, arXiv:2406.17325, 2024.

[8] M. O. Ahmad, H. Ghanbari, T. Gustavsson, and B. R. Upreti, “It all starts with structure: Investigating learning dynamics in large-scale agile software development,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 230, p. 112561, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.112561.

[9] L. M. Restrepo-Tamayo, G. P. Gasca-Hurtado, and J. Valencia-Calvo, “Characterizing Social and Human Factors in Software Development Team Productivity: A System Dynamics Approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 59739–59755, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3388505.

[10] T. Felder et al., “Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the German Software Engineering Industry: An Empirical Study,” arXiv, preprint, arXiv:2601.16700, 2026.

[11] R. Tomaz, P. Guenes, A. A. Araújo, M. T. Baldassarre, and M. Kalinowski, “Impacts of Generative AI on Agile Teams' Productivity: A Multi-Case Longitudinal Study,” arXiv, preprint, arXiv:2602.13766, 2026.

[12] S. Maatta, “How Do Programmers Evaluate AI-Generated Code?” in Proc. 2025 ACM/IEEE Int. Symp. Empirical Softw. Eng. Meas. (ESEM), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2025, pp. 522–527, doi: 10.1109/ESEM64174.2025.00057.

[13] T. Vhahangwele, B. Isong, and A. A. Mahfouz, “The Impact of Team Dynamics on Software Quality and Productivity: Evidence from South Africa,” Journalisi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 809–840, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1438.

[14] P. Diebold, “From backlogs to bots: Generative AI's impact on agile role evolution,” J. Softw.: Evol. Process, vol. 37, no. 1, p. e2740, 2025, doi: 10.1002/smr.2740.

[15] J. Zhou et al., “Exploring the problems, their causes and solutions of AI pair programming: A study on GitHub and Stack Overflow,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 219, p. 112204, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.112204.

[16] W. Mendes, S. Souza, and C. de Souza, “You're on a bicycle with a little motor”: Benefits and Challenges of Using AI Code Assistants,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th Int. Conf. Cooperative Hum. Aspects Softw. Eng. (CHASE), Lisbon, Portugal, 2024, pp. 45–56, doi: 10.1145/3643750.3643758.

[17] V. Stray, A. Barbala, and V. T. Wivestad, “Human-AI Collaboration in Software Development: A Mixed-Methods Study of Developers’ Use of GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT,” in Companion Proc. 33rd ACM Int. Conf. Foundations Softw. Eng. (FSE Companion '25), New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2025, pp. 1325–1332, doi: 10.1145/3696630.3730566.

[18] S. Ferino, R. Hoda, J. Grundy, and C. Treude, “Walking the Tightrope of LLMs for Software Development: A Practitioners' Perspective,” arXiv, preprint, arXiv:2511.06428, 2025.

[19] A. Welter et al., “An Empirical Study of Knowledge Transfer in AI Pair Programming,” in Proc. 2025 40th IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Autom. Softw. Eng. (ASE), 2025, pp. 210–222, doi: 10.1109/ASE62340.2025.00021.

[20] T. Chen, “The impact of AI-pair programmers on code quality and developer satisfaction: Evidence from Timi Studio,” in Proc. 2024 Int. Conf. Generative Artif. Intell. Inf. Secur. (GAIIS), 2024, pp. 88–94, doi: 10.1109/GAIIS62410.2024.00015.

[21] D. Shao and F. Ishengoma, “Empirical Analysis of Generative AI Tool Adoption in Software Development,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 182, p. 108036, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2025.108036.

[22] A. Kumar et al., “Intuition to Evidence: Measuring AI's True Impact on Developer Productivity,” arXiv, arXiv:2509.19708, 2025.

[23] E. Paradis et al., “How much does AI impact development speed? An enterprise-based randomized controlled trial,” in Proc. 2025 IEEE/ACM 47th Int. Conf. Softw. Eng.: Softw. Eng. Practice (ICSE-SEIP), 2025, pp. 312–323, doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIP64321.2025.00034.

[24] M. Muñoz et al., “Comparative study of AI code generation tools: Quality assessment and performance analysis,” Lat. Am. J. Inf. Technol. (LatIA), vol. 2, pp. 104–104, 2024.

[25] M. E. Souza and E. C. S. Murillo, “How Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools Can Improve the Quality of Software Produced by Software Development Teams,” J. Softw. Eng. Res. Dev., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2025, doi: 10.5753/jserd.2025.4125.

[26] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

[27] S. K. Ahmed et al., “Using thematic analysis in qualitative research,” J. Med., Surgery, Public Health, vol. 6, p. 100198, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198.

[28] P. Hoffmann, D. Zercher, and T. C. Schimmer, “How AI communication capabilities affect developer productivity in AI pair programming: Insights from a large software development organization,” in Research-in-Progress Papers, European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2025 TREOs), Paper 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/treos_ecis2025/23

[29] V. V. Jensen, A. Alami, A. R. Bruun, et al., “Managing expectations towards AI tools for software development: a multiple-case study,” Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manage., vol. 23, pp. 869–901, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10257-025-00704-7.

[30] K. Koyanagi et al., “Exploring the effect of multiple natural languages on code suggestion using GitHub Copilot,” in Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Min. Softw. Repositories (MSR), Lisbon, Portugal, 2024, pp. 115–126, doi: 10.1145/3643990.3644012.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): June

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors Declaration

  1. The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
  2. The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
  3. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
  4. The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
  5. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
  6. The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
  7. If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
  8. The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights

Most read articles by the same author(s)