Mapping Sentiment Analysis in Educational Technology: OpenAlex Bibliometrics, Thematic Trends, and Research Gaps (2013-2025)

Authors

  • Dany Pratmanto Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Indonesia
  • Fabriyan Fandi Dwi Imaniawan Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Indonesia
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i3.1604

Keywords:

Sentiment analysis, Educational technology, Bibliometric analysis, OpenAlex, Learning analytics

Abstract

This study aims to map the intellectual structure, publication growth, collaboration patterns, thematic evolution, and research gaps of sentiment analysis in educational technology. The study addresses the lack of an open and integrated bibliometric synthesis that connects productivity, collaboration, topic modelling, and gap detection in this field. A bibliometric and science-mapping approach was applied using OpenAlex-indexed publications from 2013 to 2025. After deduplication and eligibility screening, 977 publications were analysed, while 768 papers with sufficient abstract text were used for Non-negative Matrix Factorisation topic modelling. The analysis included publication trend analysis, country and institutional productivity, co-authorship networks, keyword burst analysis, geographic gap analysis, and platform mention analysis. The results show that annual publications increased from 22 papers in 2013 to 123 papers in 2024, with India and China as the most productive countries. Six thematic clusters were identified: Learning Analytics, Social Media Sentiment, Emotion Recognition, MOOCs and E-learning, Transformers/LLMs, and ML Classifier Ensembles. Learning Analytics was the largest cluster, while Transformers/LLMs showed the fastest recent growth. The novelty of this study lies in its reproducible OpenAlex-based bibliometric framework, which integrates performance analysis, science mapping, thematic evolution, and research gap identification for sentiment analysis in educational technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Á. Ortigosa, J. M. Martín, and R. M. Carro, “Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to e-learning,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 31, pp. 527–541, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.024.

[2] B. Pang and L. Lee, “Opinion mining and sentiment analysis,” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 1–135, 2008, doi: 10.1561/1500000011.

[3] B. Liu, Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. in Synthesis lectures on human language technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012. doi: 10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016.

[4] M. Wen, D. Yang, and C. P. Rose, “Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: What does it tell us?” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), 2014, pp. 130–137.

[5] A. Onan, “Sentiment analysis on massive open online course evaluations: A text mining and deep learning approach,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 572–589, 2021, doi: 10.1002/cae.22253.

[6] A. V. Savchenko, “Classifying emotions and engagement in online learning based on a single facial expression recognition system,” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3188390.

[7] S. D'Mello and A. Graesser, “Dynamics of affective states during complex learning,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001.

[8] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT), 2019, pp. 4171–4186. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1423.

[9] T. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020, pp. 1877–1901.

[10] Z. Kastrati, F. Dalipi, A. S. Imran, K. Pireva Nuci, and M. A. Wani, “Sentiment analysis of students’ feedback with NLP and deep learning: A systematic mapping study,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 3986, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11093986.

[11] F. Dalipi, K. Zdravkova, and F. Ahlgren, “Sentiment analysis of students' feedback in MOOCs: A systematic literature review,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 728708, 2021, doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.728708.

[12] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.

[13] I. Zupic and T. Čater, “Bibliometric methods in management and organization,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 429–472, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.

[14] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

[15] J. Culbert, A. Hobert, N. Jahn, N. Haupka, M. Schmidt, P. Donner, and P. Mayr, “Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus,” Scientometrics, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 2475–2492, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11192-025-05293-3.

[16] B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan, “Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques,” in Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2002, pp. 79–86, doi: 10.3115/1118693.1118704.

[17] M. Pontiki, D. Galanis, J. Pavlopoulos, H. Papageorgiou, I. Androutsopoulos, and S. Manandhar, “SemEval-2014 task 4: Aspect based sentiment analysis,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), 2014, pp. 27–35, doi: 10.3115/v1/S14-2004.

[18] A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani, “SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 2006, pp. 417–422.

[19] C. J. Hutto and E. Gilbert, “VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2014, pp. 216–225, doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550.

[20] A. Yadollahi, A. G. Shahraki, and O. R. Zaiane, “Current state of text sentiment analysis from opinion to emotion mining,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 25:1–25:33, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3057270.

[21] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997, doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.

[22] S. Minaee, N. Kalchbrenner, E. Cambria, N. Nikzad, M. Chenaghlu, and J. Gao, “Deep learning-based text classification: A comprehensive review,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1–40, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3439726.

[23] T.-Y. Chen, C.-C. Chou, and S.-L. Chang, “Exploring student perceptions of online courses in the context of collaborative learning,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 82–102, 2014, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1830.

[24] R. W. Picard, Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.

[25] I. Adeshola and A. P. Adepoju, “The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education,” Interactive Learning Environments, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858.

[26] X. Chen, D. Zou, H. Xie, and F. L. Wang, “Data-driven artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2023.3245566.

[27] O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 39, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.

[28] F. J. Hinojo-Lucena, I. Aznar-Díaz, M. P. Cáceres-Reche, and J. M. Romero-Rodríguez, “Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its progressive implementation, obstacles and challenges,” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 51, 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9010051.

[29] V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre, “Fast unfolding of communities in large networks,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2008, no. 10, p. P10008, 2008, doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.

[30] D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung, “Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization,” Nature, vol. 401, no. 6755, pp. 788–791, 1999, doi: 10.1038/44565.

[31] L. Waltman, N. J. van Eck, and E. C. M. Noyons, “A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 629–635, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.

[32] T. Nazaretsky, M. Cukurova, and G. Alexandron, “An instrument for measuring teachers’ trust in AI-based educational technology,” LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 56–66, 2022, doi: 10.1145/3506860.3506866.

[33] A. Rogers, O. Kovaleva, and A. Rumshisky, “A primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 8, pp. 842–866, 2020, doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00349.

[34] A. Conneau et al., “Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale,” pp. 8440–8451, 2020, doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.747.

[35] P. Patwa et al., “SemEval-2020 task 9: Overview of sentiment analysis of code-mixed tweets,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, 2020, pp. 774–790, doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.100.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): June

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors Declaration

  1. The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
  2. The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
  3. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
  4. The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
  5. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
  6. The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
  7. If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
  8. The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights