Group Decision Making Using Mean SAW Borda and Decision Maker-Based Criteria Weighting

  • Pradityo Utomo Universitas Merdeka Madiun, Indonesia
  • Dwi Nor Amadi Merdeka Madiun University, Indonesia
Keywords: group decision making, SAW Borda, Mean, criteria weight, decision maker

Abstract

In an organization, unfair decisions are often a problem. Therefore, this study creates a group decision-making model to optimize the achievement of fair decisions. This study combines the Mean and Simple Additive Weighting Borda (SAW Borda) methods. The combination of these methods is called Mean SAW Borda. The Mean calculation is used to obtain the average value of decision-makers. The mean value can be the weight of the group decision-making criteria. The weight is the reference for the SAW Borda calculation. This aims to optimize fair decisions. The SAW Borda calculation provides group decisions. This study uses data on the election of a university's head of the Informatics Engineering study program. In the study program, 24 decision-makers gave scores to choose the head of the study program. The Means SAW Borda method calculates the assessment, and the result is that A4 has the highest decision value (1923.26573). The results of the Mean SAW Borda method are the same as those of the conventional election. The conventional method chooses A4 to be the elected candidate. Based on these results, the Mean SAW Borda method can produce fair decisions and is agreed upon by decision-makers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. K. Pardosi and N. A. Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Ketua Program Studi Menerapkan Metode VIKOR,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2021, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i2.305.

J. A. M. Molinera, F. J. Cabrerizo, J. Mezei, C. Carlsson, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “A dynamic group decision making process for high number of alternatives using hesitant Fuzzy Ontologies and sentiment analysis,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 195, p. 105657, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105657.

H. Santoso, W. Widodo, and R. Swastyani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik dengan Metode AHP , Oreste dan Borda,” J. FASILKOM, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 681–687, 2024.

S. Liu, F. T. S. Chan, and W. Ran, “Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 55, pp. 37–47, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.059.

M. Tavana, S. M. H. Mousavi, H. Mina, and F. Salehian, “A dynamic decision support system for evaluating peer-to-peer rental accommodations in the sharing economy,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 91, no. March, p. 102653, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102653.

B. Alavi, M. Tavana, and H. Mina, “A Dynamic Decision Support System for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Circular Economy,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 27, pp. 905–920, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.015.

Y. Primadasa and Alfiarini, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Pembobotan Ahp Dan Moora,” Cogito Smart J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 159–170, 2019.

A. C. Marques et al., “Support for multicriteria group decision with voting procedures: Selection of electricity generation technologies,” Clean. Environ. Syst., vol. 3, no. October, p. 100060, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100060.

R. P. Sari, Istikoma, and F. Supriadi, “The Comparison of SAW BORDA and TOPSIS BORDA Methods In the Zakat Recipient Determination System Education programs ( Case Study : BAZNAS , West Kalimantan Province ),” 2019, doi: 10.4108/eai.11-12-2019.2290862.

T. F. A. Aziz, S. Sulistiyono, H. Harsiti, A. Setyawan, A. Suhendar, and T. A. Munandar, “Group decision support system for employee performance evaluation using combined simple additive weighting and Borda,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 830, no. 3, pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/830/3/032014.

P. Utomo and D. N. Amadi, “Pemilihan Tanaman Pangan Untuk Ketahanan Pangan Masa Pandemi Dengan Simple Additive Weighting Di Kabupaten Madiun,” Fountain Informatics J., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 12, 2020, doi: 10.21111/fij.v5i3.4924.

Y. Sonatha, M. Azmi, and I. Rahmayuni, “Group Decision Support System Using AHP, Topsis and Borda Methods for Loan Determination in Cooperatives,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 372–379, 2021, doi: 10.30630/JOIV.5.4.640.

F. Fitriyani, B. Adiwinoto, E. Helmud, A. A. Alkodri, and A. Anisah, “GDSS Penilaian Kinerja Pada ISB Atma Luhur Menggunakan Metode SAW dan Borda,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 136–141, 2022, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v11i1.1382.

Fitriyani and D. Irawan, “Gdss Pemilihan Karyawan Berprestasi Pada Smk Kesehatan Mutiara Mandiri Sungailiat Menggunakan Metode Saw Dan Borda,” J. Teknol. Inf. Mura, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 79–90, 2022, doi: 10.32767/jti.v14i2.1831.

C. Z. Radulescu, M. Radulescu, and R. Boncea, “A Hybrid Group Weighting Method based on the Borda and the Group Best Worst Method with application for digital development indicators,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2022, vol. 214, pp. 10–17, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.142.

P. Utomo, A. Budiman, and D. N. Amadi, “Optimasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting Menggunakan Skala Likert dalam Aplikasi Pemilihan Peserta Rapat Bersih Dusun,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ampera, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 141–156, 2023.

S. F. Fitria, E. Harahap, F. Badruzzaman, Y. Fajar, and D. Darmawan, “Aplikasi Rata-Rata Data Tunggal,” in Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan 2018, 2018, pp. 145–150.

T. F. A. Aziz, S. Sulistiyono, H. Harsiti, A. Setyawan, A. Suhendar, and T. A. Munandar, “Group decision support system for employee performance evaluation using combined simple additive weighting and Borda,” in IOP Conf. Series : Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/830/3/032014.

D. Meidelfi, Yulherniwati, F. Sukma, D. Chandra, and A. H. Soleliza Jones, “The implementation of SAW and BORDA method to determine the eligibility of students’ final project topic,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 144–149, 2021, doi: 10.30630/joiv.5.1.447.

P. Utomo, “Pengembangan Model Pengambilan Keputusan Kelompok Secara Multi Level dengan Kriteria Dinamis dan Metode Fuzzy Learning Vector Quantization,” Universitas Diponegoro, 2024.

D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020.

D. Lippman, Math in Society. 2017.

Y. Windriono, R. K. Dewi, and L. Fanani, “Pengembangan Aplikasi Rekomendasi Kolam Renang menggunakan Metode Topsis Borda,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3332–3338, 2021.

Nurjannah and D. P. Utomo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyeleksian Colour Guard Pada Marching Band Ginada Dengan Menggunakan Metode Vikor Dan Borda,” JUKI J. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2020.

P. Sugiartawan, N. N. D. Ardriani, and I. M. W. Kusuma, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Promosi Jabatan Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,” J. Sist. Inf. dan Komput. Terap. Indones., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 36–47, 2021, doi: 10.22146/jsikti.

Fitriyani and Y. Andrika, “Analisis Penerapan Metode Ahp Dan Borda Untuk Kawasan KPHP ( Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi ) Sungai Sembulan Bangka Tengah,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2024.

Published
2025-06-30
Abstract views: 67 times
Download PDF: 30 times
How to Cite
Utomo, P., & Amadi, D. (2025). Group Decision Making Using Mean SAW Borda and Decision Maker-Based Criteria Weighting. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 7(2), 1658-1672. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v7i2.1132
Section
Articles