Enterprise Architecture Design for the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) at the East Kalimantan Housing and Settlement Office Using the TOGAF ADM Framework

Authors

  • Eko Junirianto Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Agustinus Frizt WIjaya University of Bunda Mulia, Indonesia
  • Desi Pujiati Gunadarma University, Indonesia
  • Dewi Safitriani Politeknik Sinarmas Berau Coal, Indonesia
  • Reza Andrea Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Indonesia
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i3.1638

Keywords:

SPBE, TOGAF ADM, Enterprise Architecture, Digital Governance, Public Service Information System

Abstract

The Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) is a central component of Indonesia's digital governance strategy. At the East Kalimantan Housing and Settlement Office (Disperkim), the quality index of residential areas has persistently failed to reach its annual target, indicating fragmented information system use and structural inefficiencies in managing infrastructure, facilities, and public utilities (PSU) services. This study proposes an enterprise architecture design based on the TOGAF ADM framework to address this gap. Employing an architectural design research approach, the study collected primary data through semi-structured interviews with five Disperkim stakeholders and secondary data from Presidential Regulation No. 95 of 2018 on SPBE. The resulting blueprint covers four domains, business, data, application, and technology, and is aligned with organizational performance indicators and regulatory requirements. A key contribution is the proposed integration of the Sakti Gemas mobile application as a centralized public service platform that is expected to support more responsive PSU service delivery. The proposed architecture was validated at the design level through a Focused Group Discussion (FGD) with key Disperkim stakeholders, confirming its contextual appropriateness and technical feasibility. No implementation or quantitative service-performance evaluation has been conducted; operational impact can only be measured after system deployment. This study contributes a replicable architectural model for improving digital governance effectiveness in similar regional government institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). "Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, Article 101560. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101560

[2] Wirtz, B. W., & Daiser, P. (2018). "E-Government: Strategy process instruments," German Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 32, no. 3-4, pp. 255-278. DOI: 10.1177/2397002218775686.

[3] Raihan, M. M., Subroto, S., Chowdhury, N., Koch, K., Ruttan, E., & Turin, T. C. (2025). Dimensions and barriers for digital (in) equity and digital divide: a systematic integrative review. Digital Transformation and Society, 4(2), 111-127.

[4] Yunis, M., Tarhini, A., & Kassar, A. (2018). "The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, vol. 88, pp. 344-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.030

[5] Zachman, J. A. (2008). "The Zachman Framework: The official concise definition," Zachman International.

[6] Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2007). "Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture," Journal of Enterprise Architecture, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 7-18

[7] Lankhorst, M., Proper, H. A., & Jonkers, H. (2009). Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01310-2

[8] Sessions, R. (2007). "A comparison of the top four enterprise-architecture methodologies," Microsoft Developer Network Architecture Center, pp. 1-31.

[9] Novianto, F., Kurniawan, N. B., & Surendro, K. (2019). "Enterprise architecture design using TOGAF 9.1 framework," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1192, no. 1, Article 012038. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1192/1/012038

[10] Republik Indonesia. (2018). "Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik," Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.

[11] Busch, N. R. and Zalewski, A., (2025). A systematic literature review of enterprise architecture evaluation methods. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(5), pp.1-36.

[12] Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). "Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, Supplement 1, pp. S1-S8. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003

[13] Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). "Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions," Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, pp. 282-291. DOI: 10.1145/2037556.2037602

[14] Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). "A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 512-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004

[15] Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). "ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 119-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002

[16] United Nations. (2020). "United Nations E-Government Survey 2020: Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development," United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. ISBN: 978-92-1-123210-5.

[17] United Nations. (2016). "United Nations E-Government Survey 2016: E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development," United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. ISBN: 978-92-1-123205-1.

[18] Bernus, P., & Nemes, L. (2016). "A framework to define a generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology," Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 179-191. DOI: 10.1016/0951-5240(96)00014-0

[19] Meijer, A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). "Smart city research: Contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment," Social Science Computer Review, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 647-656. DOI: 10.1177/0894439315618890

[20] Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017). "Understanding smart cities: A tool for smart government or an industrial trick?," Public Administration and Information Technology, vol. 22, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57015-0

[21] Qurratuaini, Q., Hidayanto, A. N., Purwandari, B., & Budi, N. F. A. (2020). "Enterprise architecture design for optimizing business processes in housing sector using TOGAF ADM 9.1," Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), pp. 825-830. DOI: 10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211230

[22] Yunis, R., & Telaumbanua, K. (2020). Enterprise architecture design for construction services using TOGAF ADM framework. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(9), 102-109.

[23] Supangkat, S. H., Arman, A. A., & Fatimah, D. (2019). Design of enterprise architecture for electronic-based government system in housing sector using TOGAF ADM 9.1. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 662(2), 022103.

[24] Kurniawan, N. B., Suhardi, & Yusup, M. (2021). Information system architecture design using TOGAF ADM for promotion function in public sector organizations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 012118.

[25] Wijaya, A. F., & Ranti, B. (2018). Enterprise architecture design for human resource management using TOGAF ADM: A case study in banking sector. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 218-227.

[26] Gong, Y., & Janssen, M. (2019). "The value of and myths about enterprise architecture," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 46, pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.006

[27] Ahlemann, F., Legner, C., & Lux, J. (2021). "A resource-based perspective of value generation through enterprise architecture management," Information & Management, vol. 58, no. 1, Article 103266. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103266

[28] Kotusev, S., Singh, M., & Storey, I. (2015). "Investigating the usage of enterprise architecture artifacts," Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany, Paper 134.

[29] Iyamu, T., & Mphahlele, L. (2020). "The impact of organisational structure on enterprise architecture deployment," Journal of Systems and Information Technology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 437-456. DOI: 10.1108/JSIT-05-2020-0078

[30] Simon, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2014). "Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management," Information Systems and e-Business Management, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10257-013-0213-4

[31] Arista, A., & Purabaya, R. H. (2024). Modeling architecture with the TOGAF framework to support the smart village in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Engineering Information Technology, 14(2), 472–483.

[32] Andrea, R., Sjamsir, H., Ramadhani, F., & Arfyanti, I. (2025). Enterprise architecture for e-government development using TOGAF ADM 9.2 in Simpang Pasir Village. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 17(6), 18–33.

[33] Fahlevi, A. H., Nugraha, R. A., Falahah, & Mujahidillah, A. S. (2023). Enterprise architecture design on data and application domain using TOGAF framework (case study: Communication and Informatics Office of Bandung City Government). Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Business and Technology Management (ICONDBTM). pp. 1-7. IEEE

[34] Jwaid, M. F. (2025). A model-driven information systems architecture for residential management based on TOGAF domains. Samarra Journal of Pure and Applied Science, 7(3), 225–245.

[35] Garibay, L., Mercado, J., & Paucar, E. (2024). Architectural model based on TOGAF to attend to the admission of families in a shelter. Proceedings of the IEEE XXXI International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON). (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): June

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors Declaration

  1. The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
  2. The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
  3. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
  4. The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
  5. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
  6. The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
  7. If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
  8. The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights