Technology Acceptance Model TAM using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling PLS- SEM
A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
The rapid advancement of digital technologies necessitates a deeper focus on user acceptance and satisfaction, particularly within the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). This systematic literature review examines 36 articles published between 2020 and 2025, revealing that factors such as trust, system quality, perceived enjoyment, service quality, and technological self-efficacy significantly influence user satisfaction. These external variables enhance the explanatory power of TAM, providing a richer understanding of user interactions with digital platforms such as e-commerce, e-learning, and mobile banking. PLS-SEM's ability to manage model complexity, non-normal data distributions, and interrelated constructs further validates its suitability for this research. The findings suggest that integrating these external factors improves both the theoretical and practical aspects of TAM in the context of technology adoption. Future research could explore additional industry-specific applications for emerging technologies.
Downloads
References
T. Rosita and R. Fatmasari, “Acceptance of Distance Learning Technology in Technology-Based Learning Management,” Al-Tanzim J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1191–1201, 2023, doi: 10.33650/al-tanzim.v7i4.5945.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
J. Jia and J. Dou, “An autonomous driving future for the elderly: Analyzing the willingness and expectations of the elderly based on bibliometrics,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 106, no. February, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103715.
A. T. Sasongko, M. Ekhsan, and M. Fatchan, “Dataset on technology acceptance in E-learning: A PLS-SEM analysis using extended TAM among undergraduate students in Indonesia,” Telemat. Informatics Reports, vol. 18, no. December 2024, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2025.100192.
M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” Rev. Panam. Salud Publica/Pan Am. J. Public Heal., vol. 46, pp. 178–189, 2022, doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.112.
A. Ortiz‑López, J. C. Sánchez‑Prieto, and S. Olmos‑Migueláñez, “Perceived usefulness of mobile devices in assessment: a comparative study of three technology acceptance models using PLS‑SEM,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 13, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44322-023-00001-6.
A. Brandon-Jones and K. Kauppi, “Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 22–42, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0346.
C. Or, “Watch That Attitude ! Examining the Role of Attitude in the Technology Acceptance Model through Meta- Analytic Structural Equation Modelling To cite this article : Or , C . ( 2024 ). Watch that attitude ! Examining the role of attitude in the Technology A,” 2024.
M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair, M. Pick, B. D. Liengaard, L. Radomir, and C. M. Ringle, “Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1035–1064, 2022, doi: 10.1002/mar.21640.
J. Setyono, “Intention to Use Islamic Mobile Banking: Integration of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior with Trust,” Muqtasid J. Ekon. dan Perbank. Syariah, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 127–142, 2022, doi: 10.18326/muqtasid.v13i2.127-142.
P. C. Lai and E. J. Y. Liew, “Towards a Cashless Society: The Effects of Perceived Convenience and Security on Gamified Mobile Payment Platform Adoption,” 2021. doi: 10.3127/AJIS.V25I0.2809.
D. Kurniasih, P. I. Setyoko, and M. N. Huda, “Insights into Mobile Government Adoption Factors: A Comprehensive Analysis of Peduli Lindungi Application in Indonesia,” CommIT J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2024, doi: 10.21512/commit.v18i1.9024.
A. Legesse, B. Beshah, E. Berhan, and E. Tesfaye, “Exploring the influencing factors of blockchain technology adoption in national quality infrastructure: a Dual-Stage structural equation model and artificial neural network approach using TAM-TOE framework,” Cogent Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2024.2369220.
C. Qu and E. Kim, “Investigating AI Adoption, Knowledge Absorptive Capacity, and Open Innovation in Chinese Apparel MSMEs: An Extended TAM-TOE Model with PLS-SEM Analysis,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1–31, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17051873.
X. Sun, J. É. Pelet, S. Dai, and Y. Ma, “The Effects of Trust, Perceived Risk, Innovativeness, and Deal Proneness on Consumers’ Purchasing Behavior in the Livestreaming Social Commerce Context,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 23, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152316320.
O. C. Edo, D. Ang, E. E. Etu, I. Tenebe, S. Edo, and O. A. Diekola, “Why do healthcare workers adopt digital health technologies - A cross-sectional study integrating the TAM and UTAUT model in a developing economy,” Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, vol. 3, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100186.
S. Chen and J. Ye, “Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase smart clothing using PLS-SEM and fsQCA,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 9 September, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291870.
T. O. Fahiraningrum and R. Richard, “The Analysis of Factors That Influences People Intention to Use in Electronic Money,” PIKSEL Penelit. Ilmu Komput. Sist. Embed. Log., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 83–90, 2020, doi: 10.33558/piksel.v8i2.2271.
X. Li and H. Lin, “Using the Extended Acceptance Model to Understand Continuance Intention of Dockless Bike-Sharing,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. February, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786693.
S. Siripipatthanakul, P. Limna, T. Kraiwanit, and S. Siripipattanakul, “Predicting Intention to Use Smart Education Technology during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Higher Education Students in Thailand,” Int. Conf. Res. Dev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 8–22, 2022, doi: 10.47841/icorad.v1i2.46.
M. Dadhich, S. Poddar, and K. K. Hiran, “Antecedents and consequences of patients’ adoption of the IoT 4.0 for e-health management system: A novel PLS-SEM approach,” Smart Heal., vol. 25, no. December 2021, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100300.
A. S. Edu, “Paths to digital mobile payment platforms acceptance and usage: A topology for digital enthusiast consumers,” Telemat. Informatics Reports, vol. 15, no. July, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2024.100158.
M. Ashoer, C. Jebarajakirthy, X. J. Lim, M. Mas’ud, and Z. A. Sahabuddin, “Mobile fintech, digital financial inclusion, and gender gap at the bottom of the pyramid: An extension of mobile technology acceptance model,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 234, no. 2023, pp. 1253–1260, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.122.
A. S. Al-Adwan, N. Li, A. Al-Adwan, G. A. Abbasi, N. A. Albelbisi, and A. Habibi, ““Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 15381–15413, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3.
Z. J. A. Belmonte, Y. T. Prasetyo, M. M. L. Cahigas, R. Nadlifatin, and M. J. J. Gumasing, “Factors influencing the intention to use e-wallet among generation Z and millennials in the Philippines: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) approach,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 250, no. July, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104526.
T. Thi Nguyet Trang, P. Chien Thang, G. Thi Truong Nguyen, and H. Thi Minh Nguyen, “Factors driving Gen Z’s news engagement on TikTok: A hybrid analysis through CB-SEM and PLS-SEM,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports, vol. 18, no. February, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100645.
R. Jena, “Factors Impacting Senior Citizens’ Adoption of E-Banking Post COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study from India,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 16, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jrfm16090380.
L. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Wang, and Y. Zhao, “Explaining consumer implementation intentions in mobile shopping with SEM and fsQCA: Roles of visual and technical perceptions,” Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., vol. 49, no. October 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101080.
C. Z. Oroni, F. Xianping, D. D. Ndunguru, and A. Ani, “Enhancing cyber safety in e-learning environment through cybersecurity awareness and information security compliance: PLS-SEM and FsQCA analysis,” Comput. Secur., vol. 150, no. December 2024, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2024.104276.
M. Yao-Ping Peng, Y. Xu, and C. Xu, “Enhancing students’ English language learning via M-learning: Integrating technology acceptance model and S-O-R model,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13302.
N. Saif, S. U. Khan, I. Shaheen, A. Alotaibi, M. M. Alnfiai, and M. Arif, “Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 154, no. November 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097.
V. Sharma, K. Jangir, M. Gupta, and R. Rupeika-Apoga, “Does service quality matter in FinTech payment services? An integrated SERVQUAL and TAM approach,” Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, vol. 4, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100252.
R. W. Idayani, E. Wahyu, and T. Darmaningrat, “^ Evaluation of factors affecting student acceptance of Evaluation of factors affecting student acceptance Zedemy using of the Unified Theory student of Acceptance and of Use Evaluation factors affecting acceptan,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 234, pp. 1276–1287, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.125
U. Alturki and A. Aldraiweesh, “An Empirical Investigation into Students’ Actual Use of MOOCs in Saudi Arabia Higher Education,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15086918.
V. Z. Vanduhe, M. Nat, and H. F. Hasan, “Continuance Intentions to Use Gamification for Training in Higher Education: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Motivation, and Task Technology Fit (TTF),” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 21473–21484, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966179.
B. C. Ezeudoka and M. Fan, “Determinants of behavioral intentions to use an E-Pharmacy service: Insights from TAM theory and the moderating influence of technological literacy,” Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 605–617, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.007.
N. Zeng, Y. Liu, P. Gong, M. Hertogh, and M. König, “Do right PLS and do PLS right: A critical review of the application of PLS-SEM in construction management research,” Front. Eng. Manag., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 356–369, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42524-021-0153-5.
R. Carranza, E. Díaz, C. Sánchez-Camacho, and D. Martín-Consuegra, “e-Banking Adoption: An Opportunity for Customer Value Co-creation,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. January, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.621248.
W. J. Obidallah et al., “Beyond the hype: A TAM-based analysis of blockchain adoption drivers in construction industry,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 19, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38522.
S. Na, S. Heo, S. Han, Y. Shin, and Y. Roh, “Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Technologies in Construction Firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Combination with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) Framework,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12020090.
T. T. Goh, X. Dai, and Y. Yang, “Benchmarking ChatGPT for prototyping theories: Experimental studies using the technology acceptance model,” BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks, Stand. Eval., vol. 3, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tbench.2024.100153.
P. Purwanto, M. Sulthon, and M. Wafirah, “Behavior Intention to Use Online Zakat: Application of Technology Acceptance Model with Development,” Ziswaf J. Zakat Dan Wakaf, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 44, 2021, doi: 10.21043/ziswaf.v8i1.10457.
E. Xhafaj, D. H. Qendraj, A. Xhafaj, and N. Gjikaj, “A Hybrid Integration of PLS-SEM, AHP, and FAHP Methods to Evaluate the Factors That Influence the Use of an LMS,” Int. J. Decis. Support Syst. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 736–752, 2022, doi: 10.4018/IJDSST.286697.
N. M. Farhan and B. Setiaji, “Analysis of User Satisfaction while Implementing New Self Order Kiosk (SOK) Technology Using the TAM and Smart PLS Methods,” Indones. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 284–301, 2023.
Y. X. Loh, C. Sen Seah, E. E. M. Arif, F. W. Jalaludin, W. Y. Chin, and N. A. A. Hamid, “A Collaborative Model in Persuasive Web Design: Multiple case study of Lazada and Shopee,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 234, pp. 1609–1616, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.164.
I. Masudin, D. P. Restuputri, and D. B. Syahputra, “Analysis of Financial Technology User Acceptance Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Method,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 227, pp. 563–572, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.559.
W. Yang, M. Fang, J. Xu, X. Zhang, and Y. Pan, “Exploring the Mediating Role of Different Aspects of Learning Motivation between Metaverse Learning Experiences and Gamification,” Electron., vol. 13, no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13071297.
D. O. Sari, R. Putra, and A. Alamsyah, “Does e-service for research and community service boost the performance of university lecturers?,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 261–270, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20831.
R. W. Idayani, E. Wahyu, and T. Darmaningrat, “Evaluation of factors affecting student acceptance of Evaluation of factors affecting student acceptance Zedemy using of the Unified Theory student of Acceptance and of Use Evaluation factors affecting acceptan,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 234, pp. 1276–1287, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.125
A. Baskara, N. Nuryakin, and S. D. Handayani, “The Mediating Role of Trust and its Relationship with the Perception of Convenience and Transparency on User Satisfaction of Electronic Procurement Services,” 2024. doi: 10.30587/jurnalmanajerial.v11i01.5650.
T. Thi Uyen Nguyen, P. Van Nguyen, H. Thi Ngoc Huynh, G. Q. Truong, and L. Do, “Unlocking e-government adoption: Exploring the role of perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, and social media engagement in Vietnam,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 10, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100291.
N. A. Felber, W. Lipworth, Y. J. Tian, D. Roulet Schwab, and T. Wangmo, “Informing existing technology acceptance models: a qualitative study with older persons and caregivers,” Eur. J. Ageing, vol. 21, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10433-024-00801-5.
“View of Behavioral Intentions of Generation Z and Millennial Users of Telemedicine_ A UTAUT 2 Analysis from the Halodoc User Perspective.pdf.”
A. Granić, “Technology Acceptance and Adoption in Education,” Handb. Open, Distance Digit. Educ., pp. 183–197, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_11.
C. Gupta, V. Gupta, and A. Stachowiak, “Adoption of ICT-Based Teaching in Engineering: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Perspective,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 58652–58666, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072580.
Abstract views: 192 times
Download PDF: 86 times
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- I certify that I have read, understand and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (Journal-ISI) submission guidelines, policies and submission declaration. Submission already using the provided template.
- I certify that all authors have approved the publication of this and there is no conflict of interest.
- I confirm that the manuscript is the authors' original work and the manuscript has not received prior publication and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and has not been previously published.
- I confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
- I confirm that the paper now submitted is not copied or plagiarized version of some other published work.
- I declare that I shall not submit the paper for publication in any other Journal or Magazine till the decision is made by journal editors.
- If the paper is finally accepted by the journal for publication, I confirm that I will either publish the paper immediately or withdraw it according to withdrawal policies
- I Agree that the paper published by this journal, I transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher (including commercial rights)
_1.png){kind=logo}
