Exploring Public University Undergraduate Students’ Experiencing Intention to Use ChatGPT in Academic Purpose:  Application of TAM Theory

S. M. Ashraful Alam

doi:10.51519/journalisi.v6i3.789

S. M. Ashraful Alam Begum Rokeya University, Bangladesh

DOI: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i3.789

Keywords: ChatGPT, AI, TAM, Rangpur

Abstract

This study is all about exploring the public university students’ experiencing intention to use ChatGPT in academic purpose with the application of TAM theory along with new extension like enjoyment, informativeness and privacy and security factors. The study was conducted in Rangpur division, Bangladesh. Total 412 data were found valid after data collection. SPSS and Smart PLS software were applied for analysis of the data with TAM theory. The study result shows that, all the factors except perceived enjoyment impacts positively the attitudes of students. Service providers of ChatGPT should consider this factor carefully so that in future they can update some new feature with ChatGPT that may be enjoyable to the users. Teachers of the university should be careful while examining students’ different assignments and projects whether they are not directly copied from ChatGPT or not. Future studies can be with other factors with the existing factors and mediation can also be done by the researchers for further study. School and college level students may be considered for this type of study and the sample size should be larger for better result.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Menon and K. Shilpa, “‘Chatting with ChatGPT’: Analyzing the factors influencing users’ intention to Use the Open AI’s ChatGPT using the UTAUT model,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e20962, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E20962.

M. A. Al-Sharafi, M. Al-Emran, M. Iranmanesh, N. Al-Qaysi, N. A. Iahad, and I. Arpaci, “Understanding the impact of knowledge management factors on the sustainable use of AI-based chatbots for educational purposes using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 7491–7510, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2075014.

M. Al-Emran, A. A. Alqudah, G. A. Abbasi, M. A. Al-Sharafi, and M. Iranmanesh, “Determinants of Using AI-Based Chatbots for Knowledge Sharing: Evidence From PLS-SEM and Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA),” IEEE Trans Eng Manag, vol. 71, pp. 4985–4999, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2023.3237789.

E. Handoyo, M. Arfan, Y. A. A. Soetrisno, M. Somantri, A. Sofwan, and E. W. Sinuraya, “Ticketing Chatbot Service using Serverless NLP Technology,” Proceedings - 2018 5th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer and Electrical Engineering, ICITACEE 2018, pp. 325–330, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICITACEE.2018.8576921.

A. S. Miner, L. Laranjo, and A. B. Kocaballi, “Chatbots in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic,” npj Digital Medicine 2020 3:1, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–4, May 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0280-0.

A. Miklosik, N. Evans, and A. M. A. Qureshi, “The Use of Chatbots in Digital Business Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 106530–106539, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3100885.

B. D. Lund and T. Wang, “Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?,” Library Hi Tech News, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 26–29, May 2023, doi: 10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Opinion Paper: ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy,” Int J Inf Manage, vol. 71, p. 102642, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2023.102642.

H. S. Sætra, “Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good?,” Technol Soc, vol. 75, p. 102372, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2023.102372.

M. Dowling and B. Lucey, “ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture,” Financ Res Lett, vol. 53, p. 103662, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.FRL.2023.103662.

J. V. Pavlik, “Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education,” https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 84–93, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/10776958221149577.

W. Jiao, W. Wang, J.-T. Huang, X. Wang, and Z. Tu, “Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? A Preliminary Study”, Accessed: Jun. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/facebookresearch/

M. Leippold, “Thus spoke GPT-3: Interviewing a large-language model on climate finance,” Financ Res Lett, vol. 53, p. 103617, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.FRL.2022.103617.

E. A. M. van Dis, J. Bollen, W. Zuidema, R. van Rooij, and C. L. Bockting, “ChatGPT: five priorities for research,” Nature 2023 614:7947, vol. 614, no. 7947, pp. 224–226, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7.

S. Wang, H. Scells, B. Koopman, and G. Zuccon, “Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search?,” SIGIR 2023 - Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1426–1436, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3539618.3591703.

T. Lynn, L. Muzellec, B. Caemmerer, and D. Turley, “Social network sites: early adopters’ personality and influence,” Journal of Product and Brand Management, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2017, doi: 10.1108/JPBM-10-2015-1025/FULL/PDF.

R. Reinhardt and S. Gurtner, “Differences between early adopters of disruptive and sustaining innovations,” J Bus Res, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 137–145, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2014.04.007.

P. Plötz, U. Schneider, J. Globisch, and E. Dütschke, “Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany,” Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, vol. 67, pp. 96–109, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.TRA.2014.06.006.

T. Y. Eng and G. Quaia, “Strategies for improving new product adoption in uncertain environments: A selective review of the literature,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 275–282, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2008.01.003.

M. A. Al-Sharafi, M. Al-Emran, M. Iranmanesh, N. Al-Qaysi, N. A. Iahad, and I. Arpaci, “Understanding the impact of knowledge management factors on the sustainable use of AI-based chatbots for educational purposes using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 7491–7510, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2075014.

M. S. Rahman, M. M. Sabbir, J. Zhang, I. H. Moral, and G. M. S. Hossain, “Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter?,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 51–71, 2023, doi: 10.14742/AJET.8956.

M. Hakiki et al., “Exploring the impact of using Chat-GPT on student learning outcomes in technology learning: The comprehensive experiment,” Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 859–872, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.013.

N. Saif, S. U. Khan, I. Shaheen, A. Alotaibi, M. M. Alnfiai, and M. Arif, “Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 154, p. 108097, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.CHB.2023.108097.

“View of Prediction of Educator’s Intention to Use Chat-GPT in Supporting Educators: A Case Study in the UAE.” Accessed: Jun. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://journals.gaftim.com/index.php/ijbas/article/view/341/221

C. K. Tiwari, M. A. Bhat, S. T. Khan, R. Subramaniam, and M. A. I. Khan, “What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT,” Interactive Technology and Smart Education, vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, 2023, doi: 10.1108/ITSE-04-2023-0061/FULL/XML.

O. Boubker, “From chatting to self-educating: Can AI tools boost student learning outcomes?,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 238, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.ESWA.2023.121820.

H. Yilmaz, S. Maxutov, A. Baitekov, and N. Balta, “Student Attitudes towards Chat GPT: A Technology Acceptance Model Survey,” International Educational Review, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–83, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.58693/IER.114.

F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.

V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, “Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead.” May 01, 2016. Accessed: Jun. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2800121

A. Strzelecki, “Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology,” Innov High Educ, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 223–245, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S10755-023-09686-1/TABLES/4.

P. Verdegem and L. De Marez, “Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview,” Technovation, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 411–423, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2011.02.004.

Maciej Serda et al., “Causal Relationships between Perceived Enjoyment and Perceived Ease of Use: An Alternative Approach,” J Assoc Inf Syst, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 24, 2006, doi: 10.2/JQUERY.MIN.JS.

M. M. Sabbir, S. Akter, T. T. Khan, and A. Das, “Exploring Factors Affecting Consumers’ Intention to Use Smartwatch in Bangladesh: An Empirical Study,” Article in Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 2020, doi: 10.14329/apjis.2020.30.3.636.

V. Noguti and D. S. Waller, “Motivations to use social media: effects on the perceived informativeness, entertainment, and intrusiveness of paid mobile advertising,” Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 36, no. 15–16, pp. 1527–1555, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2020.1799062.

C. Flavián and M. Guinalíu, “Consumer trust, perceived security and privacy policy: Three basic elements of loyalty to a web site,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 601–620, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02635570610666403/FULL/PDF.

V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1287/MNSC.46.2.186.11926.

S. Taylor and P. Todd, “Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 137–155, Jul. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Q, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036540.

E. Holdack, K. Lurie-Stoyanov, and H. F. Fromme, “The role of perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness in assessing the acceptance of AR wearables,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 65, p. 102259, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2020.102259.

F. Miao, I. V. Kozlenkova, H. Wang, T. Xie, and R. W. Palmatier, “An Emerging Theory of Avatar Marketing,” J Mark, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 67–90, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/0022242921996646/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0022242921996646-FIG3.JPEG.

A. U. Jan and V. Contreras, “Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology in universities,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 845–851, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.CHB.2010.11.009.

C. C. Yang, S. Y. Yang, and Y. C. Chang, “Predicting Older Adults’ Mobile Payment Adoption: An Extended TAM Model,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023, Vol. 20, Page 1391, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 1391, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/IJERPH20021391.

Y. C. Lee, “An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system,” Online Information Review, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 517–541, 2006, doi: 10.1108/14684520610706406/FULL/PDF.

C. K. Tiwari, M. A. Bhat, S. T. Khan, R. Subramaniam, and M. A. I. Khan, “What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT,” Interactive Technology and Smart Education, vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, 2023, doi: 10.1108/ITSE-04-2023-0061/FULL/PDF.

J. H. Wu and S. C. Wang, “What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model,” Information & Management, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 719–729, Jul. 2005, doi: 10.1016/J.IM.2004.07.001.

M. S. Akter, M. R. I. Bhuiyan, S. Tabassum, S. M. Ashraful Alam, M. N. U. Milon, and M. R. Hoque, “Factors Affecting Continuance Intention to Use E-wallet among University Students in Bangladesh,” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 71, no. 6, 2023, doi: 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I6P228.

Rahman Md. Motiur, Bhuiyan Mohammad Rakibul Islam, and Alam S. M. Ashraful, “The Empirical Study on the Impact of the COVID-19 on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Bangladesh.” Accessed: Jun. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379829495_The_Empirical_Study_on_the_Impact_of_the_COVID-19_on_Small_and_Medium_Enterprises_SMEs_in_Bangladesh

S. M. A. Alam, M. R. I. Bhuiyan, Tabassum Somaya, and M. T. Islam, “Factors Affecting Users’ Intention to Use Social Networking Sites: A Mediating Role of Social Networking Satisfaction,” Canadian Journal of Business and Information Studies, pp. 112–124, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.34104/CJBIS.022.01120124.

S. A. Hussain, F. Ogundimu, and S. Bhattarai, “Mobile Phone-Based Chatbot for Family Planning and Contraceptive Information,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11582 LNCS, pp. 342–352, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-22219-2_26/TABLES/3.

R. Malik, R. Malik, A. Shrama, S. Trivedi, and R. Mishra, “Adoption of Chatbots for Learning among University Students: Role of...,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 200–212, 2021.

G. B. Svendsen, J. A. K. Johnsen, L. Almås-Sørensen, and J. Vittersø, “Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 323–334, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.553740.

K. Demir and G. E. Güraksın, “Determining middle school students’ perceptions of the concept of artificial intelligence: A metaphor analysis,” Participatory Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 297–312, 2022, doi: 10.17275/PER.22.41.9.2.

A. Granić and N. Marangunić, “Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 2572–2593, 2019, doi: 10.1111/BJET.12864.

D. A. Adams, R. R. Nelson, and P. A. Todd, “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication,” MIS Q, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 227–247, 1992, doi: 10.2307/249577.

H. Yilmaz, S. Maxutov, A. Baitekov, and N. Balta, “Student’s Perception of Chat GPT: A Technology Acceptance Model Study”, doi: 10.58693/ier.114.

T. S. H. Teo, V. K. G. Lim, and R. Y. C. Lai, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage,” Omega (Westport), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 25–37, Feb. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0.

I. Ha, Y. Yoon, and M. Choi, “Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment,” Information & Management, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 276–286, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1016/J.IM.2007.01.001.

T. Teo, “Colloquium Is there an attitude problem? Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM,” 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00913.x.

W. Jeon, C. Ahn, and H. Gwon, “Causal Model of Participation, Perceived Enjoyment, and Learning Attitudes in ‘the 0th Period Physical Education Class’ of Middle Schools in South Korea,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, Vol. 18, Page 7668, vol. 18, no. 14, p. 7668, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/IJERPH18147668.

H. Lu and P. Yu‐Jen Su, “Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites,” Internet Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 442–458, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1108/10662240910981399.

M. Holzwarth, C. Janiszewski, and M. M. Neumann, “The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior,” https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.019, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 19–36, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1509/JMKG.70.4.019.

M. S. Reddy and G. V. Chalam, “A comprehensive study of online Internet buyers trust, trustworthiness and purchasing behavior in Indian perspective,” International Journal of Management & Information Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 97–102, 2013.

S. Pandey and D. Chawla, “Impact of changing consumer lifestyles and website quality on online satisfaction and loyalty - an emerging market framework,” International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 50, 2016, doi: 10.1504/IJICBM.2016.073393.

I. M. Alharbi, S. Zyngier, and C. Hodkinson, “Privacy by design and customers’ perceived privacy and security concerns in the success of e-commerce,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 702–718, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-07-2013-0039/FULL/PDF.

J. Efrim Boritz and W. G. No, “E-Commerce and Privacy: Exploring What We Know and Opportunities for Future Discovery,” Journal of Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 11–45, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.2308/ISYS-10090.

S. J. Milberg, H. J. Smith, and S. J. Burke, “Information Privacy: Corporate Management and National Regulation,” https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.35.12567, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–57, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1287/ORSC.11.1.35.12567.

R. D. Petty, “Marketing without Consent: Consumer Choice and Costs, Privacy, and Public Policy,” https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.42.16940, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42–53, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1509/JPPM.19.1.42.16940.

A. Rezgui, A. Bouguettaya, and M. Y. Eltoweissy, “Privacy on the web: Facts, challenges, and solutions,” IEEE Secur Priv, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 40–49, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1109/MSECP.2003.1253567.

B. Shapiro and C. R. Baker, “Information technology and the social construction of information privacy,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 20, no. 4–5, pp. 295–322, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00037-0.

E. M. Caudill and P. E. Murphy, “Consumer Online Privacy: Legal and Ethical Issues,” https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.7.16951, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7–19, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1509/JPPM.19.1.7.16951.

N. Lim, “Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences,” Electron Commer Res Appl, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 216–228, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00025-5.

J. A. Castañeda, F. J. Montoso, and T. Luque, “The dimensionality of customer privacy concern on the internet,” Online Information Review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 420–439, 2007, doi: 10.1108/14684520710780395/FULL/PDF.

J. C. Roca, J. J. García, and J. J. de la Vega, “The importance of perceived trust, security and privacy in online trading systems,” Information Management and Computer Security, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 96–113, 2009, doi: 10.1108/09685220910963983/FULL/XML.

H. Wang, M. Lee, and C. Wang, “Consumer privacy concerns about internet marketing,” Commun ACM, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 63–70, 1998.

S. M. Furnell and T. Karweni, “Security implications of electronic commerce: A survey of consumers and businesses,” Internet Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 372–382, 1999, doi: 10.1108/10662249910297778/FULL/PDF.

C. Chou, L. Condron, and J. C. Belland, “A review of the research on Internet addiction,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 363–388, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1007/S10648-005-8138-1/METRICS.

S. L. Jarvenpaa, N. Tractinsky, L. Saarinen, and M. Vitale, “Consumer trust in an internet store: A cross-cultural validation,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 5, no. 2, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1111/J.1083-6101.1999.TB00337.X/4584190.

D. Gefen, “E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust”, OMEGA,” The International Journal of Management Science, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 725–737, 2000.

M. Lee and E. Turban, “Trust in B-to-C electronic commerce: a proposed research model and its application,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–91, 2001.

S. Dong-Her, C. Hsiu-Sen, C. Chun-Yuan, and B. Lin, “Internet security: Malicious e-mails detection and protection,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 613–623, 2004, doi: 10.1108/02635570410550278/FULL/PDF.

C. Flavián and M. Guinalíu, “Consumer trust, perceived security and privacy policy: Three basic elements of loyalty to a web site,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 601–620, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02635570610666403/FULL/PDF.

S. Laforet and X. Li, “Consumers’ attitudes towards online and mobile banking in China,” International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 362–380, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1108/02652320510629250/FULL/XML.

A. Athiyaman, “Internet users’ intention to purchase air travel online: an empirical investigation,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 234–242, Jul. 2002, doi: 10.1108/02634500210431630.

F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.

M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, “Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.” 1977. Accessed: Jun. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://philpapers.org/rec/FISBAI?all_versions=1

R. Wilkes, N. Guppy, and L. Farris, “‘No Thanks, We’re Full’: Individual Characteristics, National Context, and Changing Attitudes Toward Immigration1,” International Migration Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 302–329, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1111/J.1747-7379.2008.00126.X.

C. Kerschner and M. H. Ehlers, “A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice,” Ecological Economics, vol. 126, pp. 139–151, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2016.02.010.

S. Ahmad, S. H. Bhatti, and Y. Hwang, “E-service quality and actual use of e-banking: Explanation through the Technology Acceptance Model,” https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919871611, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 503–519, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0266666919871611.

J. K. Park, J. Ahn, T. Thavisay, and T. Ren, “Examining the role of anxiety and social influence in multi-benefits of mobile payment service,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 47, pp. 140–149, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2018.11.015.

A. Shuhaiber and I. Mashal, “Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes,” Technol Soc, vol. 58, p. 101110, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2019.01.003.

R. A. Peterson and D. R. Merunka, “Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility,” J Bus Res, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1035–1041, May 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2013.08.010.

H. Brodaty et al., “Influence of population versus convenience sampling on sample characteristics in studies of cognitive aging,” Ann Epidemiol, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 63–71, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.ANNEPIDEM.2013.10.005.

A. Leguina, “A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM),” International Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 220–221, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806.

R. P. Bagozzi and Y. Yi, “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” J Acad Mark Sci, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 74–94, Mar. 1988, doi: 10.1007/BF02723327.

C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, Feb. 1981, doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.

J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, “The Assessment of Reliability,” Psychometric Theory, vol. 3, pp. 248–292, 1994.

J. Hair, “Multivariate Data Analysis,” Faculty and Research Publications, Feb. 2009, Accessed: Apr. 04, 2024.

W. C. lack, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham, Multivariate Data Analysis. 2006.

R. Thomson, D. W. Barclay, and C. A. Higgins, “The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration,” Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, pp. 284–324, 1995.

J. Henseler, “Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling,” J Acad Mark Sci, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 402–413, May 2012, doi: 10.1007/S11747-011-0298-6/TABLES/2.

J. O. Berger and T. Sellke, “Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence,” J Am Stat Assoc, vol. 82, no. 397, pp. 112–122, 1987, doi: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478397.

S. Greenland et al., “Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations,” Eur J Epidemiol, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 337–350, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1007/S10654-016-0149-3/METRICS.

E. H. Livingston, “Who was student and why do we care so much about his t-test?1,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 58–65, May 2004, doi: 10.1016/J.JSS.2004.02.003.

P. Armstrong, R. Garrido, and J. D. D. Ortúzar, “Confidence intervals to bound the value of time,” Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev, vol. 37, no. 2–3, pp. 143–161, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00019-3.

A. Kwangsawad and A. Jattamart, “Overcoming customer innovation resistance to the sustainable adoption of chatbot services: A community-enterprise perspective in Thailand,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 100211, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JIK.2022.100211.

R. Chocarro, M. Cortiñas, and G. Marcos-Matás, “Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics,” Educ Stud, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 295–313, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426.

R. De Cicco, S. C. L. da C. e. Silva, and F. R. Alparone, “‘It’s on its way’: Chatbots applied for online food delivery services, social or task-oriented interaction style?,” Journal of Foodservice Business Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 140–164, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1080/15378020.2020.1826268.

L. Mo, X. Zhang, Y. Lin, Z. Yuan, and Z. Peng, “Consumers’ Attitudes towards Online Advertising: A Model of Personalization, Informativeness, Privacy Concern and Flow Experience,” Sustainability 2023, Vol. 15, Page 4090, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 4090, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/SU15054090.