Barriers to Business Process Innovation in Public Service Organizations

Authors

  • Arista Qiyamullaily Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Tony Dwi Susanto Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November Surabaya, Indonesia
  • ER Mahendrawathi Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November Surabaya, Indonesia
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i3.858

Keywords:

Business Process Management, Business Process Innovation, Public Sector Innovation

Abstract

This study aims to identify the main barriers in implementing business process innovation in government organizations using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. The barriers were categorized into four aspects: people, technology, structure, and process, in accordance with the Socio-Technical Theory approach. The results show that a lack of knowledge and training related to innovation, limited funding, and inadequate technological infrastructure are the dominant barriers. In addition, complex bureaucracy and lack of structured processes are also significant barriers. The research recommends a holistic approach that includes improved communication, training, technology investment, as well as bureaucratic reform to foster more effective innovation. The findings provide a basis for better policy-making and emphasize the importance of further research to understand and address barriers to innovation in different countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. Hijal-Moghrabi, M. Sabharwal, and K. Ramanathan, “Innovation in public organizations: do government reforms matter?,” Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., vol. 33, no. 6–7, pp. 731–749, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-04-2020-0106.

R. Maqdliyan and D. Setiawan, “Antecedents and consequences of public sector organizational innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 9, no. 2, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100042.

M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, and H. A. Reijers, Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia and Nomor 59 Tahun 2020, “Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik,” 2020.

A. V. Lopes and J. S. Farias, “How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature,” Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 114–130, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1177/0020852319893444.

M. Abdolhosseinzadeh, F. Mohammadi, and M. Abdolhamid, “Identifying and prioritizing barriers and challenges of Social Innovation implementation in the Public Sector,” vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, 2023.

A. Raipa and V. Giedraityte, “Innovation Process Barriers in Public Sector: a Comparative Analysis in Lithuania and the European Union,” Int. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 9, no. 10, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n10p10.

E. Cinar, P. Trott, and C. Simms, “A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 264–290, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.

R. Challenger and C. W. Clegg, “Crowd disasters: A socio-technical systems perspective,” Contemp. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 343–360, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1080/21582041.2011.619862.

D. Moher et al., “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement,” PLoS Med., Jul. 01, 2009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

R. Dekker, P. van den Brink, and A. Meijer, “Social media adoption in the police: Barriers and strategies,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 2, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101441.

F. Q. B. Da Silva, C. Costa, A. C. C. França, and R. Prikladinicki, “Challenges and solutions in Distributed Software Development Project Management: A systematic literature review,” in Proc. - 5th Int. Conf. Glob. Softw. Eng. ICGSE 2010, IEEE Computer Society, 2010, pp. 87–96, doi: 10.1109/ICGSE.2010.18.

B. Kitchenham, “Kitchenham, B.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in software engineering.” Ebse Technical Report. Vol. 5, 2007.

R. P. Bostrom and J. S. Heinen, “MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Part I: The Causes,” 1977.

E. L. Trist and K. W. Bamforth, “Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting,” 1951, doi: 10.1177/001872675100400101.

P. Bakunzibake, G. O. Klein, and S. M. Islam, “E-Government Implementation Process in Rwanda: Exploring Changes in a Sociotechnical Perspective,” Bus. Syst. Res., Apr. 01, 2019, doi: 10.2478/bsrj-2019-0005.

K. Kozioł-Nadolna and K. Beyer, “Barriers to innovative activity in the sustainable development of public sector organizations,” in Procedia Comput. Sci., Elsevier B.V., 2021, pp. 4376–4385, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.214.

E. Cinar, C. Simms, P. Trott, and M. A. Demircioglu, “Public sector innovation in context: A comparative study of innovation types,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 265–292, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2080860.

G. Smith, J. Sochor, and I. C. M. A. Karlsson, “Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 116–137, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1462399.

T. J. Hertrich and T. Brenner, “Classification of regions according to the dominant innovation barriers: The characteristics and stability of region types in Germany,” Reg. Sci. Policy Pract., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 2182–2223, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12711.

M. Moussa, “Barriers on Innovation in Australian Public Sector Organisations,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Innovation, A. McMurray, N. Muenjohn, and C. Weerakoon, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 179–196, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59916-4_10.

T. Figenschou, J. Li-Ying, A. Tanner, and M. Bogers, “Open innovation in the public sector: A literature review on actors and boundaries,” Technovation, vol. 131, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102940.

Y. Niu, W. Wen, S. Wang, and S. Li, “Breaking barriers to innovation: The power of digital transformation,” Financ. Res. Lett., vol. 51, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103457.

E. Cinar, C. Simms, P. Trott, and M. A. Demircioglu, “Public sector innovation in context: A comparative study of innovation types,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 265–292, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2080860.

S. Singler and A. A. Guenduez, “Barriers to public sector innovation in Switzerland: A phase-based investigation,” Aust. J. Public Adm., 2024, doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12639.

E. Uyarra, J. Edler, J. Garcia-Estevez, L. Georghiou, and J. Yeow, “Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective,” Technovation, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 631–645, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003.

R. Mu and H. Wang, “A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 489–511, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787.

W. Wipulanusat, K. Panuwatwanich, R. A. Stewart, and J. Sunkpho, “Drivers and barriers to innovation in the Australian public service: A qualitative thematic analysis,” Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7–22, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.2478/emj-2019-0001.

E. Cinar, P. Trott, and C. Simms, “An international exploration of barriers and tactics in the public sector innovation process,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 326–353, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1668470.

K. Kozioł-Nadolna and K. Beyer, “Barriers to innovative activity in the sustainable development of public sector organizations,” in Procedia Comput. Sci., Elsevier B.V., 2021, pp. 4376–4385, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.214.

J. P. Vassallo, S. Banerjee, H. Zaman, and J. C. Prabhu, “Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance,” Res. Policy, vol. 52, no. 6, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104768.

E. Cinar, P. Trott, and C. Simms, “A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 264–290, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.

R. Dekker, P. van den Brink, and A. Meijer, “Social media adoption in the police: Barriers and strategies,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 2, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101441.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-24

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): September

Section

Articles

License

Authors Declaration

  1. The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
  2. The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
  3. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
  4. The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
  5. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
  6. The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
  7. If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
  8. The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights

How to Cite

[1]
A. Qiyamullaily, T. D. Susanto, and E. Mahendrawathi, “Barriers to Business Process Innovation in Public Service Organizations”, journalisi, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1973–1986, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i3.858.