Investigation of Relationship Between Google Cost-Per-Click and Search-Volume on Keyword of Chicago Tours

Authors

  • Ramin Abolghasemi Komleh University of Innsbruck, Austria
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v5i3.518

Keywords:

Google Ads . Google AdWords . Pay-per-Click PPC . Cost-per-Click CPC

Abstract

Pay-per-click is one of common and important ways in online advertising through Google; but some keywords are usually expensive and this issue is visible through Google cost-per-click in Google keyword planner tool. It has done many research work in Google advertising formats, but place of studies in field of relationship between Google cost-per-click and keyword search-volume, especially in tourism area is blank. This paper tries to answer of this main question that is there a significant relationship between cost-per-click and keyword search-volume and the number of keyword's word? In other words, does cost-per-click increase or decrease, based on keyword search-volume and the number of keyword's word (multi-word keyword or hyper focused keyword phrases)? Chicago auspicates a mighty increase in tourism 2022 as its announcement an 86 percent growth in visitors in 2021 compared to 2020 and choosing the right keyword in Google search engine by travel agencies can lead to more sales. In this research, I sampled 100 search result through combination of ″chicago+tours″ as a search keyword on google.com (Google USA) and Google keyword planner daily data (December 26, 2022) based on the last 7-10 days, and via regression analysis with least squares and loess model, I tried to investigate the relationship between search-volume and cost-per-click and it will help scholars in future research in this area. This study was carried out within the scope of selected keyword in tourism area in form of cross-sectional. I find that there is no significant relationship between short-tail keywords and cost-per-click. The result of this research shows that some medium or long-tail keywords are more expensive than short-tail keywords with more search results. Another result that was observed is the lack of significant relationship between keyword search-volume and its cost-per-click, so that in some cases, high-search keywords are cheaper than keywords with a low-search.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Tutaj and E. A. van Reijmersdal, “Effects of online advertising format and persuasion knowledge on audience reactions,” Journal of Marketing Communications, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5–18, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1080/13527266.2011.620765.

H. Li and J. D. Leckenby, “Examining the effectiveness of internet advertising formats,” Internet advertising: theory and research, pp. 203–224, 2007.

D. Belanche, “Ethical limits to the intrusiveness of online advertising formats: A critical review of Better Ads Standards,” Journal of Marketing Communications, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 685–701, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/13527266.2018.1562485.

A. Erdmann, R. Arilla, and J. M. Ponzoa, “Search engine optimization: The long-term strategy of keyword choice,” J Bus Res, vol. 144, pp. 650–662, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.065.

S. Brin and L. Page, “Reprint of: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine,” Computer Networks, vol. 56, no. 18, pp. 3825–3833, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.10.007.

S. Z. Za and I. Tricahyadinata, “An Analysis on the Use of Google AdWords to Increase E-Commerce Sales,” International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 60–67, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.3126/ijssm.v4i1.16433.

G. Boone, J. Secci, and L. Gallant, “Emerging trends in online advertising,” Doxa communicacion, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 241–253, 2010.

M. Lee, “Google ads and the blindspot debate,” Media Cult Soc, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 433–447, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0163443710394902.

O. J. Rutz and R. E. Bucklin, “A Model of Individual Keyword Performance in Paid Search Advertising,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1024765.

R. Graham, “Google and advertising: digital capitalism in the context of post-Fordism, the reification of language, and the rise of fake news,” Palgrave Commun, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 45, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1057/s41599-017-0021-4.

H. Kang and M. P. McAllister, “Selling You and Your Clicks: Examining the Audience Commodification of Google,” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 141–153, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.31269/triplec.v9i2.255.

M. Raffinot and R. Rivière, “Optimizing Google Shopping Campaigns Structures with Query-Level Matching,” Aug. 2017.

K. K. Kapoor, Y. K. Dwivedi, and N. C. Piercy, “Pay-per-click advertising: A literature review,” The Marketing Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 183–202, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1362/146934716X14636478977557.

E. D’Avanzo, T. Kuflik, and A. Elia, “Online Advertising Using Linguistic Knowledge,” in Information Technology and Innovation Trends in Organizations, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD, 2011, pp. 143–150. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2632-6_17.

S. Y. Lim, “Can Google be Liable for Trademark Infringement? A Look at the ‘Trademark Use’ Requirement as Applied to Google AdWords,” UCLA Entertainment Law Review, vol. 14, no. 2, 2007, doi: 10.5070/LR8142027100.

J. Liang, H. Yang, J. Gao, C. Yue, S. Ge, and B. Qu, “MOPSO-Based CNN for Keyword Selection on Google Ads,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 125387–125400, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937339.

L. Shi and B. Li, “Predict the click-through rate and average cost per click for keywords using machine learning methodologies,” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations ManagementDetroit, Michigan, USA, pp. 694–700, 2016.

G. Szymanski and P. Lininski, “Model of the Effectiveness of Google Adwords Advertising Activities,” in 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), IEEE, Sep. 2018, pp. 98–101. doi: 10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526633.

S. Yang, J. Pancras, and Y. (Amy) Song, “Broad or exact? Search Ad matching decisions with keyword specificity and position,” Decis Support Syst, vol. 143, p. 113491, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113491.

A. V Plotnikov, P. A. Kuznetsov, A. A. Urasova, and E. M. Akhmetshin, “Correlation analysis of the data on the UK and US market for contextual advertising,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1630–1639, 2018.

G. Rich, “An Empirical Analysis of the Auction Bids for Keyword Types in Sponsored Search,” Northwestern University, 2008.

K. K. K. M. Ramaboa and P. Fish, “Keyword length and matching options as indicators of search intent in sponsored search,” Inf Process Manag, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 175–183, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2017.11.003.

A. Agarwal, K. Hosanagar, and M. D. Smith, “Location, Location, Location: An Analysis of Profitability of Position in Online Advertising Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1057–1073, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1509/jmr.08.0468.

A. Ghose and S. Yang, “An Empirical Analysis of Search Engine Advertising: Sponsored Search in Electronic Markets,” Manage Sci, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1605–1622, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1054.

H. (Alice) Li, P. K. Kannan, S. Viswanathan, and A. Pani, “Attribution Strategies and Return on Keyword Investment in Paid Search Advertising,” Marketing Science, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 831–848, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1287/mksc.2016.0987.

O. J. Rutz and R. E. Bucklin, “From Generic to Branded: A Model of Spillover in Paid Search Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 87–102, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.1.87.

S. Wenning, “Use and Effect of Google Ads Effect of Google Ads for M arketing S uccess,” International Journal of Management and Humanities, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 23–26, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.35940/ijmh.B1402.116321.

M. Yamamoto, “How can we attract tourists more effectively?,” Journal of Global Tourism Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–12, 2016, doi: 10.37020/jgtr.1.1_9.

T. Y. Chan, C. Wu, and Y. Xie, “Measuring the Lifetime Value of Customers Acquired from Google Search Advertising,” Marketing Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 837–850, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1287/mksc.1110.0658.

J. Pesonen, “Tourism Marketing in Facebook: Comparing Rural Tourism SME’s and Larger Tourism Companies in Finland,” in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2011, Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2011, pp. 537–546. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0503-0_43.

W. Chang and I. Chang, “The Influences of Humorous Advertising on Brand Popularity and Advertising Effects in the Tourism Industry,” Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 9205–9217, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.3390/su6129205.

S. R. Castro, S. C. Silva, and P. Duarte, “Does Digital Marketing really boost city tourism? Evidences from Porto’s Experience,” European Journal of Applied Business & Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 84–100, 2017.

L. Law, “24 Best Places to Visit in the United States.” https://www.planetware.com/usa/best-places-to-visit-in-the-united-states-us-ny-21.htm (accessed Mar. 30, 2022).

J. Klein, “Chicago predicts strong tourism growth in 2022.” https://travelweekly.co.uk/news/tour-operators/chicago-predicts-strong-tourism-growth-in-2022 (accessed Jun. 20, 2022).

W. G. Jacoby, “Loess: a nonparametric, graphical tool for depicting relationships between variables,” Elect Stud, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 577–613, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00028-1.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Information Systems and Informatics

Section

Articles

License

Authors Declaration

  1. The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
  2. The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
  3. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
  4. The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
  5. The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
  6. The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
  7. If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
  8. The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights

How to Cite

[1]
R. A. Komleh, “Investigation of Relationship Between Google Cost-Per-Click and Search-Volume on Keyword of Chicago Tours”, journalisi, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1002–1019, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v5i3.518.